Dogs are no longer considered merely as "goods," "chattels," or objects, but as sentient beings under the law. Consequently, a refund is not dependent on returning the animal.
What’s the connection? Has the legal framework for selling animals really changed that much since 2015? This claim focuses on the buyer’s interests, not the animal’s—and in this context, the dog is still legally considered "goods."
Be careful with those kinds of shortcuts, especially on this subject. It could seriously backfire on the buyer by completely removing the transaction from the protection of general consumer law in favour of specific agricultural regulations which, for the moment, aren't particularly helpful to them.
Furthermore, any breeder, whether professional or a hobbyist, must have a registered business number (SIREN) to sell an animal. However, an individual selling only one litter a year must apply for an exemption from the authorities if they don't have a registration number. If the seller has neither a business number nor an exemption, they face a fine of around £6,300. All profits from sales (from the very first animal sold) are subject to income tax and must be declared.
Thanks for the lecture. 9 out of 10. A couple of notes: the exemption is actually automatic. And while the regulation came into effect on 1st January 2016, it was actually dated October 2015.
To take it a step further: the specific tax bracket these profits should be declared under is debatable, even if there’s a directive from the "governing body" of the profession.
I think it’s in the seller’s best interest to reach an out-of-court settlement and take responsibility. Otherwise, I don't see why the buyer should do them any favours, ESPECIALLY as they’re the ones who have to live with a sick dog and pick up the vet bills.
We seem to agree on the benefits of an amicable settlement, even if your previous message made it sound like you were egging @Medx on towards a full legal battle.
And it's in everyone's interest—depending on the value of the puppy, spending years fighting and paying legal fees that you’ll only get partially reimbursed for, all over a sum of about £1,700... well, sorry, but speaking from experience, it’s just not worth it.
That said, I never mentioned anything about the buyer doing the seller a "favour"...
😒