What's the difference between an AmStaff and a Pit Bull?

"Well, if you'd actually read what I wrote, you would have seen that I'm well aware it's a recognised breed in certain countries... Just like the breeds not recognised by the FCI that I mentioned earlier. Pff."

Pff? What's with the 'pff'? Just so you know, the link and the photos weren't aimed specifically at you; I posted them on the thread for everyone, not just for you. I've given my point of view, whether you like it or not – that's my right!

And like I said, since I haven't read anything you've written, I'm in no position to judge... and I haven't done so anyway!!

What’s weird is that a Staffie is basically just a Pit Bull with papers and isn’t really considered a dangerous dog, but a Staffie without papers (a Pittie) is.

It’s a total joke.

But there’s nothing we can do about it.

What's weird is that a Staffy with papers is basically a pit bull but isn't really classed as a dangerous dog, while a Staffy without papers (a pit) is.

It’s a load of rubbish.

But there’s nothing we can do about it.

“Thanks @Kallys34, you’re a massive help. Tell me, have you actually read a single word of what I’ve written? ... Look, I’m game. Shall we just pull up every page from every site talking about 'miniature' German Shepherds and those quirky 'designer crosses' that people sell for a profit and want to see officially recognised... or all the 'breeds' not recognised by the Kennel Club? There are loads of them, and I’ve already mentioned a few.”

To be honest, no, I haven’t read a single word of what you’ve written, so I can’t really judge whether what you’re saying about pit bulls is true or not. I just shared that link (and the photos) to show you that even though the breed isn’t officially recognised, it definitely exists. That’s all.

I think regarding the end of your post about the '99 law, everyone’s got my take on it now and can make their own minds up, so I don’t need to go over it again...